Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Cannon Kingsley vs Jacob Dunbar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kingsley vs Dunbar analysis and find out who is favored!
Cannon Kingsley vs Jacob Dunbar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kingsley has won 56.08% of points on his second serve, while Dunbar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kingsley, in recent form, has won 56.28% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dunbar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.44% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kingsley has saved 52.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dunbar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kingsley has won 57.45% of matches played (W/L 27/ 20), with Dunbar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kingsley has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 22/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 40/ 31). Dunbar has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 9/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 29/ 25).
- Player level: In the last year, Kingsley has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 13), where as Dunbar has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Kingsley winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Kingsley winning 4 and Dunbar winning 2. The last match between Kingsley and Dunbar was at the M15 East Lansing, 22-11-2019, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Cannon Kingsley getting the victory 6-3 5-7 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:23:58.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kingsley and Dunbar have played a deciding set 2 times, with Kingsley winning 2 times and Dunbar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Kingsley winning 0, and Dunbar 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kingsley has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.83 while Dunbar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kingsley has won 53% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dunbar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kingsley has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dunbar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kingsley 2 - 0 Dunbar
415
Rank
404
High
23
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
756
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
60% (99-67)
Career Total W/L
56% (54-42)
57% (4-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Cannon Kingsley | Jacob Dunbar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 35 | 25 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:23:58 | 2:23:58 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (117/193) | 60% (127/212) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (87/117) | 66% (84/127) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (42/76) | 46% (39/85) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (8/28) | 23% (3/13) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (89/212) | 33% (64/193) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Jacob Dunbar
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
||||
| 6-2 6-7(4) 6-2 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Jacob Dunbar
63%
(
60 of
96)
1st Serve %
62%
(
67 of
108)
7
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
108)
111
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Cannon Kingsley | Jacob Dunbar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 55% (11/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (107/96) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.69 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 68 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 10 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:15:50 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 44 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (435/624) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (317/435) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 56% (106/189) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (21/45) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (241/648) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cannon Kingsley Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Cannon Kingsley
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
76%
(
58 of
76)
6
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
23 of
76)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Nathan Mao
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Cannon Kingsley
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
65 of
87)
10
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
0
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
52 of
65)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
24 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Henry Searle
69%
(
64 of
93)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
9
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
100
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Jonas Forejtek
74%
(
78 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
69 of
109)
10
Aces
8
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
61 of
78)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
51 of
69)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
26 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
34 of
109)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-4 6-7(7) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Gianmarco Ferrari
71%
(
73 of
103)
1st Serve %
67%
(
71 of
106)
8
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
50 of
71)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
9 of
35)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Cannon Kingsley
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
7
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
39 of
62)
33%
(
17 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
102
Total Points Won
104
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Cannon Kingsley
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
66%
(
89 of
135)
13
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
2
87%
(
54 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
65 of
89)
64%
(
25 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
22 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
46 of
135)
125
Total Points Won
111
|
7-5 6-7(2) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Cannon Kingsley
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
72%
(
56 of
78)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
6
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Jacob Dunbar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Cannon Kingsley
Player
Jacob Dunbar
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
60 of
104)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
31 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
41 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Joao Hinsching
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
53%
(
24 of
45)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Benjamin Sigouin
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kevin King
Player
Jacob Dunbar
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
1
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Dennis Novikov
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
44%
(
45 of
102)
7
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
9
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
36 of
45)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Redlicki
Player
Jacob Dunbar
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Oscar Mesquida Berg
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
73%
(
46 of
63)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacob Dunbar
Player
Vasil Kirkov
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Shane
Player
Jacob Dunbar
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
14
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kingsley Vs Dunbar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
